Candidate Scoring MVP

Leading candidate

Candidate 8

Current top-ranked profile in this mode.

Leader score

5.00

Weighted output on the 0–5 scoring scale.

Cohort average

58.0%

Mean weighted score across the full field of 21 candidates.

Risk flags

8

Candidates that need additional scrutiny before advancement.

Scoring form

Editable 21-candidate matrix

The scoring workspace is now organized into a roster editor and criterion lanes, keeping all 21 candidates on screen without forcing a side-to-side table scroll.

How to use the matrix

Edit candidate labels once in the roster, set the weight for each criterion, and then score the field in the criterion lanes below. Each lane wraps naturally to the available width so the view stays usable on a laptop screen.

appeal

Voter Appeal

Public credibility, recognizability, and ability to connect across constituencies.

organization

Constituency Presence

Visibility on the ground, relationship depth, and capacity for direct engagement.

organization

Campaign Readiness

Preparedness for canvassing, media, fundraising, and coordinated field execution.

appeal

Message Discipline

Consistency, clarity, and ability to carry the DLP message without avoidable drift.

organization

DLP Alignment

Alignment with party values, teamwork, and willingness to support the wider slate.

integrity

Integrity & Risk

Ethical standing, reputational resilience, and absence of major liabilities.

Candidate roster

Names and live weighted totals

Use this top roster to rename placeholders quickly before working through the criterion lanes below.

Candidate 1

Weighted

23.0%

Candidate 2

Weighted

56.0%

Candidate 3

Weighted

97.0%

Candidate 4

Weighted

38.0%

Candidate 5

Weighted

77.0%

Candidate 6

Weighted

20.0%

Candidate 7

Weighted

58.0%

Candidate 8

Weighted

100.0%

Candidate 9

Weighted

45.0%

Candidate 10

Weighted

84.0%

Candidate 11

Weighted

20.0%

Candidate 12

Weighted

57.0%

Candidate 13

Weighted

98.0%

Candidate 14

Weighted

39.0%

Candidate 15

Weighted

77.0%

Candidate 16

Weighted

23.0%

Candidate 17

Weighted

60.0%

Candidate 18

Weighted

100.0%

Candidate 19

Weighted

40.0%

Candidate 20

Weighted

81.0%

Candidate 21

Weighted

24.0%

appeal

Voter Appeal

Public credibility, recognizability, and ability to connect across constituencies.

Weight25%

Candidate 1Candidate 125%Candidate 2Candidate 225%Candidate 3Candidate 325%Candidate 4Candidate 425%Candidate 5Candidate 525%Candidate 6Candidate 625%Candidate 7Candidate 725%Candidate 8Candidate 825%Candidate 9Candidate 925%Candidate 10Candidate 1025%Candidate 11Candidate 1125%Candidate 12Candidate 1225%Candidate 13Candidate 1325%Candidate 14Candidate 1425%Candidate 15Candidate 1525%Candidate 16Candidate 1625%Candidate 17Candidate 1725%Candidate 18Candidate 1825%Candidate 19Candidate 1925%Candidate 20Candidate 2025%Candidate 21Candidate 2125%

organization

Constituency Presence

Visibility on the ground, relationship depth, and capacity for direct engagement.

Weight15%

Candidate 1Candidate 115%Candidate 2Candidate 215%Candidate 3Candidate 315%Candidate 4Candidate 415%Candidate 5Candidate 515%Candidate 6Candidate 615%Candidate 7Candidate 715%Candidate 8Candidate 815%Candidate 9Candidate 915%Candidate 10Candidate 1015%Candidate 11Candidate 1115%Candidate 12Candidate 1215%Candidate 13Candidate 1315%Candidate 14Candidate 1415%Candidate 15Candidate 1515%Candidate 16Candidate 1615%Candidate 17Candidate 1715%Candidate 18Candidate 1815%Candidate 19Candidate 1915%Candidate 20Candidate 2015%Candidate 21Candidate 2115%

organization

Campaign Readiness

Preparedness for canvassing, media, fundraising, and coordinated field execution.

Weight15%

appeal

Message Discipline

Consistency, clarity, and ability to carry the DLP message without avoidable drift.

Weight10%

Candidate 1Candidate 110%Candidate 2Candidate 210%Candidate 3Candidate 310%Candidate 4Candidate 410%Candidate 5Candidate 510%Candidate 6Candidate 610%Candidate 7Candidate 710%Candidate 8Candidate 810%Candidate 9Candidate 910%Candidate 10Candidate 1010%Candidate 11Candidate 1110%Candidate 12Candidate 1210%Candidate 13Candidate 1310%Candidate 14Candidate 1410%Candidate 15Candidate 1510%Candidate 16Candidate 1610%Candidate 17Candidate 1710%Candidate 18Candidate 1810%Candidate 19Candidate 1910%Candidate 20Candidate 2010%Candidate 21Candidate 2110%

organization

DLP Alignment

Alignment with party values, teamwork, and willingness to support the wider slate.

Weight15%

integrity

Integrity & Risk

Ethical standing, reputational resilience, and absence of major liabilities.

Weight20%

Candidate 1Candidate 120%Candidate 2Candidate 220%Candidate 3Candidate 320%Candidate 4Candidate 420%Candidate 5Candidate 520%Candidate 6Candidate 620%Candidate 7Candidate 720%Candidate 8Candidate 820%Candidate 9Candidate 920%Candidate 10Candidate 1020%Candidate 11Candidate 1120%Candidate 12Candidate 1220%Candidate 13Candidate 1320%Candidate 14Candidate 1420%Candidate 15Candidate 1520%Candidate 16Candidate 1620%Candidate 17Candidate 1720%Candidate 18Candidate 1820%Candidate 19Candidate 1920%Candidate 20Candidate 2020%Candidate 21Candidate 2120%

Focused profile

Candidate for deeper comparison

Weighted score1.15

Weighted percent23.0%

Strongest criterionDLP Alignment

Weakest criterionIntegrity & Risk

Live leaderboard

Top performers

Comparison chart

Top-10 weighted leaderboard

Focused comparison

Selected candidate vs cohort average

Criterion averages

Where the field is strongest

Distribution

Field segmentation by score band

Risk watchlist